Who’s the real ‘Guardian of the Sea’? India draws a firm red line
- The Trigger:
Nobel Laureate Dr. Muhammad Yunus recently sparked controversy by referring to a “guardian of the sea” in a way that seemed to favor China. The timing and tone were interpreted as diplomatically insensitive, especially given India’s consistent maritime engagement with Bangladesh.
- India’s Firm Response:
External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar responded without naming names but made India’s stance crystal clear — India is the “Net Security Provider” in the Indo-Pacific and has proven itself as the “First Responder” in times of crisis.
- A Subtle but Strategic Message to China:
Jaishankar’s remarks also indirectly targeted China’s aggressive posture in the region. India signaled that it would no longer allow vague narratives to undermine its role in Indo-Pacific stability.
- A Caution for Neighbours:
India’s response wasn’t just a rebuttal to Yunus — it was a broader message to regional partners like Bangladesh. Relying on unproven powers over a trusted partner like India could be a diplomatic misstep.
- Track Record Speaks:
India has walked the talk:
Vaccine supplies during COVID
Rapid disaster relief in Maldives, Sri Lanka, Indonesia
Consistent adherence to maritime law and cooperative security frameworks
India’s credibility isn’t built on slogans, but actions.
—
Conclusion:
The term ‘Guardian of the Sea’ isn’t self-assigned — it’s earned through consistent leadership, responsibility, and regional trust. Jaishankar’s words were not just diplomatic posturing, but a firm reminder of India’s established role in Indo-Pacific affairs.
#Modi #Jaishankar #SeaPower #IndianNavy #MaritimeSecurity #IndoPacific #ForeignPolicy #IndiaDefense #OceanStrategy #NavalStrength
