CNN Central News & Network–ITDC India Epress/ITDC News Bhopal / Mumbai : The recent passage of the Maharashtra Special Public Security Act (SPSA) in the state legislature has triggered a wave of criticism from civil society organisations and rights groups. Passed with support from both ruling and some opposition parties in the legislative assembly, the bill faced opposition in the legislative council the following day, revealing political rifts.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who led the bill’s introduction, stated the act aims to counter “urban naxal” activities. However, critics argue that the bill’s vague language around terms like “urban naxals” and “unlawful activities” could give the government unchecked powers to target dissenters.
Activists, including Bharat Jodo Andolan convenor Ulka Mahajan, have vowed to challenge the legislation in court, citing a violation of Article 19 of the Constitution, which protects freedom of speech and expression. Over 12,300 objections were submitted against the draft bill since it was first proposed.
Concerns have also been raised about the advisory board’s independence, as it will be government-appointed, and the extensive authority given to police and district collectors to act against organisations, including confiscating property.
Mahajan emphasized that such laws were enacted in other states before stricter national laws like the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) were in place, making SPSA redundant and dangerous. Activists plan to take their protest to the streets, asserting they will not remain silent in the face of what they call “governmental suppression of dissent.”
Protest campaigns and legal action are expected in the coming days.
#MSPSA, #CivilRights, #FreedomOfSpeech, #MaharashtraPolitics, #Protest, #LegalChallenge, #DevendraFadnavis, #Article19
