CNN Central News & Network–ITDC India Epress/ITDC News Bhopal: The Supreme Court of India has quashed the FIR filed against Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhi over an Instagram post, stating that the judiciary must stand as the guardian of free speech. The FIR, filed in Uttar Pradesh, alleged that Pratapgarhi’s post contained content capable of disturbing communal harmony. However, the apex court observed that the content in question fell within the ambit of permissible expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
A bench led by Justice Abhay S Oka emphasized that judges have a constitutional duty to protect freedom of speech and expression unless there is a clear and imminent threat to public order. The judgment reiterated the need to uphold civil liberties even in politically sensitive contexts.
This ruling is being hailed as a significant affirmation of democratic values and comes at a time when the relationship between speech and law enforcement is under scrutiny. The court’s intervention sets a crucial precedent, especially for public figures and journalists facing legal action for their online expressions.
Imran Pratapgarhi welcomed the decision, stating that it strengthens faith in the judiciary and democracy. Legal experts believe this judgment may serve as a benchmark in future free speech cases involving social media content.
#ImranPratapgarhi #SupremeCourt #FreeSpeech #InstagramPost #FIRQuashed #JudicialIndependence #Article19 #CivilLiberties #CongressMP #FreedomOfExpression
